Quick Search






Newsletter No 7 - July 2007

Download PDF Version Download PDF document
Download Word Version Download Word document


Overview

This Newsletter is about the quality of submissions for Building Regulations checking and the views of Building Control officers. Key points from two long and detailed reports are:

  • many submissions demonstrate inadequate understanding of basic structural issues
  • poor co-ordination between designers, sub-contractors, and suppliers
  • quality and standards have dropped
  • Local Authority Building Control departments are under increasing
  • there may be conflicts between the role of Approved Inspectors and Local Authorities
  • risk analysis is being used as a way of deciding what should be checked
  • submissions to Local Authority checking must not be a substitute for proper professional design and in house checking.

The Building Regulations in England and Wales are the responsibility of Communities and Local Government (CLG) who are currently considering the future of Building Control (The Future of Building Control - Communities and Local Government). Later this year there will be a consultation process and the views of engineers dealing with Building Control matters from all perspectives will be sought. This is an important development upon which safety issues, and the protection of the public, depend. Participation will give valuable feedback and influence change and  details of the consultation will be given in a future Newsletter. As usual CROSS will welcome more confidential reports on these and other matters of concern.

Reports, which are in normal text below, are as written by reporters but edited to remove identification and sometimes to give clarification. The views of reporters are not changed. Comments in italics after each report are those from a panel of experts appointed by SCOSS (the Standing Committee on Structural Safety).


Overview of Reports in this Newsletter


Building Regulations checking

A reporter’s firm has been carrying out Building Regulations checks for 25 years, but it is only in the last six or seven years (say 2000-2006) that concerns have arisen, some of which are described below.

Loading on balconies

A reporter wrote on behalf of a professional committee about the conversion of an old industrial building into a series of dwellings which include new external balconies. Apparently there has been disagreement between the parties responsible for the design and construction of the development regarding the safety of the balconies

Effective lengths of load-bearing walls

A reporter is aware of several single and two storey school extensions that have been built and passed by Building Control but which have long load-bearing walls that do not comply with the limitations on effective length.

Building Regulations submissions

A detailed report has been sent by a group of senior local government structural engineers. They refer to previous CROSS newsletters and in particular the reports relating to the poor quality of building regulation submissions and lack of checking resources. Topics include:

1. Quality and complexity of the structural calculations being submitted.

2. The structural checking of submissions has come under a great deal of pressure.

3. Results of the above pressures.

Local authorities and approved inspectors

A reporter is very concerned that the system of Building Control where there is competition between Local Authorities and Approved Inspectors, has produced a situation where the level of independent inspection has fallen dramatically.


Register

Keep up to date with all the latest news and information from CROSS. If you have already registered on the old CROSS website there is no need to register again.



How to Report

Reports can be submitted through our online form

or

by posting back a completed offline form